When you buy through linkup on our site , we may earn an affiliate deputation . Here ’s how it works .
Rembrandt , da Vinci … C-3PO ?
While the Earth ’s bang-up creative person have all been humans so far , robots may soon give the old masters a run for their money . participant in the first yearly Robot Art competition showed just how far our silicon similitude have come in produce great artwork .
The TAIDA robot won the competition by painting a still life of a bowl of fruit in a classical style.
Therobotstook a variety of approaches , with some coming up with their own compositions , or challenging themselves to work with a special palette .
" The termination of this competition show a significant step in the advancement of robotics and artificial intelligence agency to create beauty . In addition to being geographically divers , the approach to make art that these automaton took wide-ranging significantly , sometimes in unexpected exciting ways . Some automaton boil down on mastering traditional painting proficiency , others experimented with artificial creative thinking , while others explore the nature of human / robot collaboration . I am excited to see how new teams take in this class ’s results , and essay to top them in next class ’s competition , " RobotArt.org founder Andrew Conrusaid in a statement . [ See Images of the Robot - Produced Paintings ]
The Robot Art competition drew 70 different competitors , and each of their paintings had a singular look and style . Though the estimation of a automaton producingart may seem antic , most of the paintings deposit to reasonably traditional dependent matters and styles .
The success of the contender , a paintbrush - wield robot call TAIDA from Taiwan University , painted a still life of a bowl of fruit in a classical style . TAIDA print the judges with its esthetic sensibility by mixing its own color pallette and painting under - stratum before conk in and coloring over parts , to make the image match mostly with the " vision " it had in thinker , similar to the mental process human artists take . TAIDA ’s Creator took home a swag of $ 30,000 .
The second - position winner , cloudPainter , was designed by Pinder and Hunter van Arman , who wanted their golem artist to have true artistic license . The cloudPainter bot oversee the entire originative appendage by taking pictures , range them and choosing the good one , and making each brushstroke severally . The robot garner its Godhead an $ 18,000 booty .
The third - place winner , NoRAA , earned a $ 12,000 prize for its abstract paintings . The automaton ’s creator , Patrick Tabarelli , sought to stage the interplay between algorithm and the physical world , he state .
Judges Patrick and Jeannie Wilshire noted that it was an good example of " artwork bring forth by a automaton , rather than through a automaton . "
While scientists and artists have experimented with computer - based picture for decennium , and industrial robots have been a keystone for painting railway car , the acclivity of robot - create art has been slow . Early attempts experimented with using the robot as a peter for laying down the human artist ’s imagination .
More recently , however , the golem have been have over more of the originative process . In April , investigator unveiled the " Next Rembrandt , " a painting done in the style of the celebrated mountain lion that used stilted intelligence to select the dependent matter , compose the house painting , and launch the actual painting with a specialized printer .
